sexta-feira, 23 de agosto de 2024

Maybe it just sounds crazy in the beginning

 Because i don't go half an hour (in fact it's much less, i realised) without thinking in the israeli hostages and their families  and because i do feel for the palestinians too, i've been praying for this deal.

But there is a lot of talk about things that, i must confess, are not my specialty. For instance, talks about israeli military presence in the border with egypt and gaza. What do i know about military strategy, what do i know about corridors? Nothing.

But what happened this morning is that i was scratching the internet for some news on the matter, hoping for good news of any kind, and i stumbled on someone saying something about the presence of international forces in gaza.

And i was like, Wait! Is that on the table?

Is that possible? That international forces go there and overlook it? I mean, if everybody is so worried about it all, it may be a good idea.

Usa, egypt, germany, people who say they care for peace.

I am not talking about leaving it all to the UN. Let's face it, the UN represents everybody but sometimes nobody. Suppose that with the best intention countries agree to "help Palestine" but the countries don't go there, just a sub-organization within the UN. So, if they fail or even do wrong (Yes, unrwa) it is a fail in the organization, not responsability of the countries.

Why the countries don't go there?

Would this break palestinian sovereignity, or offend the arab world? Come on, aren't we seeing what is happening? What sovereignity the people of gaza have? Ruled by a Terror group that is only feeding hatred, war and misery? They should start, from zero, to build real sovereignity, and they will need help. 

And the arab countries didn't even let in palestinian people who wanted to escape from the war.

So come on! Why not bring the whole world to gaza? For peace.

Press, too. Arab, israeli, american, english press, everybody. Check what is hapenning to those people. Are they in need? Are people trying to help? Are kids being turned suicidal? Are israelis doing something wrong?

As i say, i am not an expert in politics, but... is that on the table?


quarta-feira, 21 de agosto de 2024

As I Read The News Today

 

             The World Always tries to push us stereotypes. Stereotypes to tell us who is smart, stereotype to tell us who is cool. Of course you can have a general idea of what kind of people you think is cool, but stereotypes are external appearances, superficial judgements.

            Even our political views are dominated by stereotypes inherited from last century, when there was a war against the communists and the capitalists. A lot of people divide humanity in two kinds: the revolutionary, who believes “the people” can take all the political power and rule it with iron hands in favour of the poor, and the hard working meritocrat, who believe that the increasing of production will automatically solve everything.

            But in the new times we are living, this black and white division in two sides is kept alive just because we got used to it, not because it makes a lot of sense. A good example to think about is China. Is it communist or capitalist? It’s capitalist to make money and communist to control people.

            China shouldn’t be supported by our “left wing” people, because it exploits the workers as much as it can driven by profit alone. And shouldn’t be supported by our “right wing” people, because it suppresses a lot of individual freedoms that right wing people use to say they defend. Even individual meritocracy. Or don’t you think the owners of the most profitable factories are friends with the top guys of the Communist Party? Yes, China is still ruled by the Communist Party.

            So you see, we look around and judge our neighbours based on a two-side stereotype and don’t stop to think if it even applies to the World. We don’t stop to think about the strange alliances, the strange things that happen in the Globe.

Russia makes a lot of business with capitalists in the world, and it’s ruled by an ex-KGB agent – KGB was the Soviet Secret Service, communist – that have good friendship with far-right leaders. The Arab States are far from communist, they are profit-driven tyrannies.

And Russia, a lot of Arab States, together with China and North Korea, are in a kind of Alliance against the Western Countries, dividing the World, yes, but with a criterium that is dictatorships versus democracies, and not simply state versus production.

Something is indeed happening in the World. The Iranian authorities – Iran has a Supreme Leader, is perhaps the most prominent of the Arab theocracies – are making no secret that they don’t like the West. They openly consider not only Israel, but also America, as mortal enemies.

Of course is not simply about America. It’s a set of values that they want to fight against. Democracy, individual freedoms. Freedom of speech, woman rights, the value of the Constitution of a Country, that can’t simply be ignored by the leaders.

I think people in the West should take a stand against this plan of Iran. The leftist people definitely can’t support the end of all rights that people conquered. They must answer: when they support Arab dictators, are they saying that the fate of gays in this countries is to be killed, and woman to be killed if they don’t “walk the line”? Is it Forever, or do they think these extremist will have a victory against the western capitalist oppressors, and then one day be substituted by a lighter version? If so, tell it to them.

And right wing people, people who believe in work and production, can’t support these guys either. Can’t support people who want the death of America. Or Israel.

After the Jews gave us the idea that all true morals come from the same Singular Source of All Goodness, laying the foundations for our best moral principles – and after devoted, idealistic moderate, spiritualized individualists gave us the foundations for all the Science that support our industries – are we going to play Vikings to our friends, turn a blind eye to dictatorships, and support Israel only to the extend that it doesn’t get it the way of that business trip to Dubai?

Of course I know that the world of production has a lot of challenges and I am not saying that it should commit any idealistic suicide, but think. Just as it is not in the best interest of the Industry of a free country, in the long term, to have business with people who use slave or semi-slave labour, it’s also not in it’s best interest to ignore when foreign billionaires fund revolutionary organizations, colleges and politicians in the West.

We must give signs that there are values that the Western World will always defend. One of the most basic is the self-determination of our Democratic States. Our States must be respected.

Right after the current War between Israel and Hamas started – it started with a diabolic attack from Hamas – the Chinese version of Google Maps erased Israel. For a while, it showed the cities but no indication of a Country called Israel. I don’t know how it is now. If they can “erase” a Country, they are definitely saying they won’t respect any of our institutions.

It seems that in the Chinese Communist Party there has been long “philosophic” discussions about “institutions” and “constitution”, coming to the “conclusion” that both can definitely be overlooked if it is in the interest of “the people”. So instead of respecting laws that we inherited from past struggles, we simply choose what kind of people represent “the People”, and then they can do anything.

Of course institutions – and constitutions can evolve – but they are crystallizations of agreements. To give a basic example: we don’t have to discuss, at every generation, if it is acceptable to kill someone just because you don’t like him. Past generations spared us of that, they agreed on the subject and passed it to us in form of law. Law can evolve – with new agreements.

Otherwise it’s just “I know what is best for everybody so I can do whatever I want”. These laws and institutions keep our society minimally stable so we can work and try to live in peace. When right wing people that refers to themselves as “conservatives” attack basic institutions of Western Countries, I don’t think the dictators of the World, who want our ruin, are lamenting.

It’s thinking, discussing the we can, inside the institutions, like the institution of a Democratic State, change things, have new ideas, try to make life better. Maybe what these tyrants want is not something new, on the contrary. They are trying to preserve the old domination of few over the rest, they want to protect the old tyrannical ways from the winds of freedom.

There are good and bad things going on in the Democratic Countries, but in a perfect Dictatorship that is only one thing going on: the desire of the masters. Maybe they fear that if Democracy succeeds, their people will want it. When America got out of Afghanistan, and the Taleban was ready to take the power again, a boy, who was born when the American were there, died tried to get inside an airplane to escape, because he wanted to be a Soccer player and he knew his dream was going to die, all his dreams of freedom would die, under the Taleban. I think of that boy often.

But what is the relation between institutions and freedom? Aren’t they opposite? I don’t think so. Institutions should stablish respect, the ways a person can’t interfere with another. Law should say what kind of interference is acceptable and what is not. Like, “I’ll jump that fence if you are spanking someone in your house, but I know your love life is not my business”.

It’s not about the stereotypes of last century, left and right. It’s about Freedom, that is the stand we should take. Do we want the people who live under dictatorships to think we would like to share freedom with them or replace their tyrants with some other kind of tyrants? What is the opposite of throwing homosexuals from a roof? Just say “these people who practice these abominations can be accepted if they become like us”? Or is it full respect, the same rights for everybody? We should think about it.

Right now, there are more than a hundred people who were kidnaped in that diabolic attack – some are pacifists, some are students, young people with dreams, fathers, normal people – even children - are still being held hostage by Hamas.

They were kidnaped by a group that dominates Gaza and believes in violence as the only way to achieve any goal, that believes democracy is a Western lie, that people must bend to strict religious laws, and to their leaders, or die.

A negotiation for the release of the hostages is going on right now. How aren’t we all screaming that we need them home now?

sábado, 10 de agosto de 2024

The Soap Rain And The Solid Heart

 

Some people say they know a lot about the secret intentions behind everything that happens in the World, the secret connections and such. Some of those theories, conspiracy theories, are really wild, they make people believe that there is a real reality where everything is opposed to we should naturally deduct from the known facts.

            We got kind of used to relating conspiracy theories with the far right in politics, but the recent surge of antisemitism in the left, the delusions of Zionist conspiracies, of the supposed super power of a tiny nation, shows us that conspiracy theories exist in all extremes.

            This kind of theory don’t work with real logics, like real valid deductions from known facts. The only logics it seems to follow is that you should believe that the person who is saying it knows much more than the others. That’s why those theories really gain traction when they are endorsed and validated by rich, powerful and famous people.

            People think, this guy must know something. Then it grows like a snow ball, more and more people believing it. Some people will believe something just because someone who is richer than him seem to believe it, or it could be a teacher in college who you admire. The validation comes not from logic, but from a certain ladder of success, academical for certain people, or financial to others.

            But then a paradox appears. Like, these theories are supposed to tell the truth about the people who secretly rule the world, but the theory is being revealed to you from the upper degrees of a ladder of worldly success. But aren’t the people who rule the world in the upper degrees?

            How people normally “solve” this paradox? Well, the people who get their “secrets” from the academical ladder of success believe the academical world have nothing to do with the world of financial power, and the people who get it from the economic ladder of success seem to believe that these powerful depraved elites who rule the world are not the same people who rule production, they are like, politicians and such, or the people who master the financial stock roulettes.

            But the point is that the academical world, the political world, they need input, money input like every other big thing – the financial roulette needs input too: the stock market sharks are not so self sufficient, they have clients, investors. So, the world of production heavily influences these other spheres of powers

            Now, I am not saying that it is a wrong thing to have success with production or in academia, or in politics, per se, or even in financial investments. I am not a communist and I don’t think having success is wrong per se, but the simple fact that a theory is “revealed” to you by someone who is more successful should never be enough to validate it.

            “This guy must know something” should never substitute logics, real careful reasoning, real valid deductions. We must think for ourselves. Where is it written that the search for truth and the ladder of success must coincide perfectly?

            If we throw logics away, we are erasing the possibilities for understanding between human beings. If you give someone the right to just point – and not have to prove – that “this guy said this but it’s not what he believes” or even “he did this but it is just to hide that” then how can we ever get to peace?

            Of course people lie and do things with weird intentions, but we can see the direction people and institutions are going to, through their action and speeches. You don’t need secret theories, all you need is to enlarge your frame of time. If you see not only what happened this minute but learn about someone’s words and actions through history, then you see the direction things are going.

            I think nobody can rule the world as if he was the screenwriter of one of those very crazy plot twist movies, where everything seems to be going perfectly in one direction and in the end it was all the opposite of what is seemed, because the masters were controlling every little detail, like the exact place a rain drop would fall. People are not gods, if you want something you usually have to push in that direction somehow.

            So, because of paranoia, the belief that common reason and logic are never sufficient to see the direction that things are going, we are depriving the other human beings of a very crucial right: The right of make declarations of principles not only with words but with actions too.

            If my words and your words, your visible actions and my visible actions, don’t have any meaning, then how can we ever solve any problem? We need to believe that our senses and our brains can get us somewhere.

Iran wants to defeat the Western world and they know they can’t pretend to love the western world, so they openly say they hate it. That’s how they will push people to fight for them. The extremist islamists are not even pretending they don’t see their people as nothing more than potential martyrs. They say this openly too.

On the other hand when Israel accepted to release 240 people who committed violence to get 105 innocent hostages back, they made a statement, that they value more life over death. They didn’t see their people as martyrs to be sacrificed in order to defeat the criminals, they released even convicted terrorists and were ready to defend themselves from the consequences of it, because they valued the life of the innocent hostages as individuals.

            There are a lot of lies in the world, that’s true, but if our intention is a better world, we will have to restore some kind of common sense, and we can’t do that by believing in information that is even less proven than what the official channels tell us, just because these “secrets” were revealed to us by people who gained our admiration for reasons that have nothing to do with logic and clearness.

            I have to admit that it is indeed a very complex World. Even one of the Wikipedia founders openly said that the site’s intended neutrality is long gone, and it is absolutely not reliable anymore when it comes to polemic issues. It is depressing, but we are seeing it happen, and we have to face it.

            So what do we do? Right now, what I can offer is this: there are indeed people who can honestly help you to see beyond what the official channels tell. But we have to ask ourselves some questions: are their theories leading us to a situation where we can, slowly and with patience, deduct more and more from the visible world, or are they leading us to a situation where soon nothing will mean nothing, except their “theory”?

            Are they making us increasingly more dependent of them, like, we will just need them more and more to see anything at all, or are they helping us to gain autonomy, to become more and more able to think for ourselves, and to try to dialogue with people who don’t read the same things?

            In other words, are they leading us to freedom or trying to imprison us?